Task 2. Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do. Some people think it is necessary, but others are of the opinion that it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
Directors of large organizations are more well-paid jobs compared to normal employees. While some people refer to that as an unreasonable discrimination, others find that important. Although there are reasons demonstrating unfair factors, I think the gap between salaries of directors and employees is crucial.
On the one hand, it is unfair when ordinary employees have lower salaries than their bosses because of their contribution and their low salaries, which can not pay for their lives. To begin with, staffs devote a lot of time, work to organizations, equivalent to directors but they earn less money. For example, in some events, ordinary workers usually spend much time preparing diligently for that so they are important factors for the success of events. However, directors earn higher profits from that than employees. In addition, in some situations, employees have low salaries, which can not meet up their need for life despite their intense work because the majority of profits is given to the director. Ultimately, the significant difference in salaries emerges, which leads to strikes for higher salaries.
On the other hand, higher salaries for the heads of organizations are necessary for their quality and their responsibilities. First, directors require not only excellent degrees in many fields but also experiences on management, communication, presentation, strategy vision. These qualifications need a lot of time, trainings to thrive so directors deserve higher salaries for that. Second, leaders of organizations have higher responsibilities than ordinary employees. They directly face challenges, difficulties of organizations, which is stressful, arduous. For instance, when some companies struggle with their products, directors usually represent and tackle that in front of social media.
In conclusion, the higher payments for directors are necessary for their high standard and responsibilities but the gap between them and ordinary workers should be considered at a reasonable level according to their efficacy and importance for organizations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-28 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | riyapatel30 | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | riyapatel30 | 11 | view |
- Task 2 More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the Internet Is this a positive or negative development 61
- Task 1 The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 67
- Task 2 Some people want governments to spend money looking for life on other planets Others however think this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Task 2 Some employers are giving increased importance to employing people with good social skills in addition to good qualifications Do you agree or disagree that social skills are as important as good qualifications for success in a job 61
- Task 1 The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...e reasons demonstrating unfair factors, I think the gap between salaries of direc...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73548387097 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21623742012 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3311142379 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.125 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216708105772 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845737701566 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460454268096 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148568297245 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544629531784 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.