There is a problem today that copyright materials, such as music, films and books are freely available on the internet with the result that the owners of works lose money. Do you feel that this is a good or bad thing?
In today’s digital era, it is easier than ever to access copyrighted materials like music, movies, and books. However, this ease of access has brought about a controversial issue: many copyrighted works are available online without authorization, allowing people to access them for free. this situation poses a financial challenge to creators and copyright holders, who often lose revenue because of the illegal sharing and downloading of their work. While some argue that unrestricted access to content online benefits society by promoting knowledge and creativity, I believe that this trend has more negative effects than positive ones. The widespread availability of copyrighted material for free threatens the livelihood of creators, undermines the quality of content, and discourages innovation.
First and foremost, free access to copyrighted materials significantly affects the income of creators. when people download or stream movies, songs, and books for free, creators miss out on sales and royalties. this financial loss can be devastating, especially for smaller or independent artists, authors, and filmmakers who rely on earnings from their work to continue producing content. For instance, many musicians struggle to survive financially because their songs are widely shared and downloaded without permission, reducing album sales and streaming revenue. if creators cannot earn a living from their work, it becomes difficult for them to sustain their creative efforts, which in turn affects the availability and diversity of new content for society as a whole.
Moreover, the prevalence of free, unauthorized access to copyrighted material often results in a decline in the quality of creative content. The entertainment industry, including publishing, film, and music, operates on a business model that relies on revenue from sales and licensing. this revenue allows companies to invest in high-quality productions, hire talented professionals, and fund large-scale projects. when these companies experience financial losses due to illegal distribution, they may have to cut costs, reducing the quality of their offerings. In some cases, they may even choose to cancel projects or avoid taking risks on innovative ideas, leading to a small vibrant, and diverse cultural landscape. For example, the movie industry may opt for safer, formulaic movies over unique, groundbreaking films if it cannot depend on steady box office returns. this trend stifles creativity and limits consumers' options for quality content.
Another significant issue with the free availability of copyrighted material is that it discourages innovation. when creators see that their work is widely accessed without payment, they may be less motivated to invest time, energy, and resources into new projects. After all, innovation requires risk-taking and commitment, but creators might avoid this effort if they feel they will not receive adequate compensation for their work. without a fair reward system in place, individuals and companies may lose their motivation to pursue new ideas or produce creative work, which is detrimental to cultural and technological progress. when the incentive for innovation diminishes, society as a whole misses out on valuable advancements, from new scientific ideas to pioneering artistic expressions.
In conclusion, the free availability of copyrighted materials online is a negative trend that harms both creators and society. By reducing the financial rewards for artists, authors, and other creators, this trend undermines the quality and variety of content available. Furthermore, it stifles the drive for innovation, as creators become less motivated to produce original and groundbreaking work. To protect the rights and livelihoods of creators and to encourage a thriving cultural environment, society needs to recognize the importance of copyright and take steps to prevent the illegal distribution of copyrighted materials.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-12 | zanzendegi | 70 | view |
| 2024-05-07 | zanzendegi | 90 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | zanzendegi | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | zanzendegi | 56 | view |
- There is a problem today that copyright materials such as music films and books are freely available on the internet with the result that the owners of works lose money Do you feel that this is a good or bad thing 56
- Accommodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas Do advantages outweigh disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...llowing people to access them for free. this situation poses a financial challenge t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 568, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... by promoting knowledge and creativity, I believe that this trend has more negati...
^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...icantly affects the income of creators. when people download or stream movies, songs...
^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...eators miss out on sales and royalties. this financial loss can be devastating, espe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...cing album sales and streaming revenue. if creators cannot earn a living from thei...
^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...es on revenue from sales and licensing. this revenue allows companies to invest in h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...sionals, and fund large-scale projects. when these companies experience financial lo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 873, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ot depend on steady box office returns. this trend stifles creativity and limits con...
^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...rial is that it discourages innovation. when creators see that their work is widely ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 436, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
...e adequate compensation for their work. without a fair reward system in place, individu...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 634, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...to cultural and technological progress. when the incentive for innovation diminishes...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, after all, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 10.4138276553 317% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3391.0 1615.20841683 210% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 586.0 315.596192385 186% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7866894198 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92010537223 4.20363070211 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04631599128 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 306.0 176.041082164 174% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522184300341 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1047.6 506.74238477 207% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 10.0 0.809619238477 1235% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1225818442 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.423076923 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26923076923 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.67935871743 230% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159214969431 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521831008991 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408328407898 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100321347794 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370627079684 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 186.0 78.4519038076 237% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.