some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; however others think there are some other ways.
International car-Free days have become a prominent initiative aimed at raising awareness about air pollution and promoting sustainable transportation. while some advocate for these events as effective means to reduce air pollution, others contend that alternative strategies may be more impactful. This essay will explore both viewpoints before concluding with my own perspective.
Proponents of international car-Free days argue that these events serve multiple purposes. Firstly, they provide a direct and immediate reduction in vehicle emissions, which significantly contributes to air pollution. By encouraging citizens to leave their cars at home, cities can experience a noticeable decrease in traffic congestion and pollution levels on these specific days. additionally, car-Free days promote the use of alternative modes of transportation, such as cycling, walking, and public transit, fostering a culture of sustainability. these events also serve as a platform for raising awareness about the detrimental effects of air pollution and the importance of reducing fossil fuel consumption, potentially leading to long-term changes in behavior.
On the other hand, critics argue that while car-Free days raise awareness, their impact on air pollution is minimal and temporary. they point out that a single day of reduced car usage does not address the underlying issues of urban transportation and air quality. Instead, they advocate for more substantial and long-term solutions, such as investing in public transportation infrastructure, implementing stricter emissions regulations, and promoting electric vehicles. these measures can lead to systemic changes in transportation habits and reduce reliance on fossil fuels in a more sustainable manner. additionally, policies that encourage urban planning, such as creating pedestrian-friendly spaces and improving cycling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | Lee Daisy | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | Taytor2609 | 67 | view |
| 2022-03-08 | vuhieuquy | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | hnhung | 67 | view |
- Accommodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas Do advantages outweigh disadvantages 73
- There is a problem today that copyright materials such as music films and books are freely available on the internet with the result that the owners of works lose money Do you feel that this is a good or bad thing 56
- some people think international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution however others think there are some other ways 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...d promoting sustainable transportation. while some advocate for these events as effec...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additionally
...ollution levels on these specific days. additionally, car-Free days promote the use of alter...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... fostering a culture of sustainability. these events also serve as a platform for rai...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...air pollution is minimal and temporary. they point out that a single day of reduced ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...tions, and promoting electric vehicles. these measures can lead to systemic changes i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additionally
...sil fuels in a more sustainable manner. additionally, policies that encourage urban planning...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.11320754717 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40375685056 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630188679245 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1763747592 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233917276883 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815293204084 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070036596502 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170681024951 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394564866714 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.