Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Ability is of little importance without opportunity. Educational institutions play a crucial role in shaping any student’s life by providing these opportunities.
Rather than thwarting any single person’s chances, any institution should focus on bolstering the opportunities that is provided. These institutions should not hold the responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing what they want based on the term “success”. Definition of success, being very vague, differs from person to person. Gaining affluence through education can be a matter of pre-eminence for that knowledge. The decision made will not be constructive, if the perception of institution does not match with that of the student.
Furthermore, the results furnished by the institution’s method to extrapolate a student’s position may be counterfactual as there is a possibility that the initial opportunities received by the student may not be equitable enough and better resources may ameliorate his state. It is also observed that few students are comfortable with what they do and nearly master that field with much ease while others learn it the hard way. They work hard and reach the same position, but this requires time, effort and opportunities. Fathom the situation where one could have reached a finer level, in spite of being a mediocre in the beginning but the institution never gave him that chance.
Institution can, however, suggest a nonplussed student, the possible options he may seek. Here also, the decision of discouragement should not be made for the student, as how much effort one is ready to put in, can be determined only by the individual. Someone too prosaic in a subject may be high-spirited towards that particular subject only and dormant towards others.
Hence, if there is commencement of seizing one’s freedom for field selection based on educational institution’s deduction of success a jillion of worthy candidates may lose their chance of excelling themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Kiho Park | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55194805195 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45794920685 2.79657885939 124% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61038961039 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6123443562 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221880395816 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726230838059 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645514938288 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117562559132 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519056224883 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.