Do you think students who go to university should pay full fee than who do not go to university given that graduates earn higher salaries. Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of graduates earn salaries and its corresponding has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of educated higher wage is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that higher gain salary for graduated university students can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, higher salaries for persons who have academic degree can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of the importance of education, as well as academic skills, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment which discovered people with university degree are more effective on their profession. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both academic education and using latest academic method apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of occupation, more income might increase the consequences of motivating youngsters to achieve academic level. Moreover, fundamental aspect of a professional career relate to this reality that the demerits of career development pertain to a skilled craft. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of job opportunities is correlated negatively with an unskilled worker. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of efficient management.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of higher annual income for graduated university students far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of job satisfaction prove the significance of fair income, but also pinpoint the influence of academic degree implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | farshid2370 | 88 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'using the latest'.
Suggestion: using the latest
...ications of both academic education and using latest academic method apparently can be seen....
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67605633803 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20646106804 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637323943662 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5357002801 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147345231579 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468509088806 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430328853572 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854110876945 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037423471886 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.