Creative Children
Creative Children
Some people believe that technology made children less creative than the past. Others think that technology has made children more creative that the past. This issue is a controversial one, but from my standpoint a close examination reveals that technology has made children nowadays less creative than they were in the past. This is because of two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, technology prevents children from figuring out things by their own. Instead, they are nowadays busy with their computers, laptops, PlayStations, and so on. In fact, when people try to understand how things in their surroundings are built, they develop their mentalities. My own experience is a compiling example of this. Back in the days, when I was at the age of ten, I did not have a phone, and I was not exposed to any kind of technology. Thus, I was trying to figure out how things around me is created. Indeed, my teachers told me that I am the best in my class because I ask a lot of questions about the things that they were teaching me. During these days, I can clearly see the differences between children and I when I was child, and I realized that there were not creative due to the reason they are exposed to several devises that make them busy not to think about anything but their games and mobiles. Therefore, I believe that children during these days are not as clever as children was in the past because of the technology of these new generations.
Not only does technology prevent children from understanding things themselves, but it also decreases their ability to think. Needless to say, children need to build their mentalities from a low age, and this could not be possible without concerning how to raise their ability to understand everything. In addition, this is paramount in order to have better future. By way of example, a friend of mine was very clever, and he always got the highest marks in my class in any subject. In fact, all the teachers loved him, and I asked myself why he is austere? Until one day, I determined to ask him what he did in order to get high marks. Hence, he told me that he did not have a phone to be busy using it, and he is focusing on studying and only studying. Henceforth, I decided to be like him, so I gave my phone to my mother and told her that I do not need it anymore. Thus, my degrees has improved, and I became the best in my school in each subject.
By way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above. I am off the opinion that in most cases technology has impacted children by making them less imaginative. This is because of it blocks them from understanding things without any help from anyone, and it reduces their ability to comprehend anything.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-16 | rosray | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | farshad_hom | 83 | view |
| 2018-04-15 | MynameisAhmed | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in fact, kind of, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 88.0 43.0788530466 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2278.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58350100604 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63851367819 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466800804829 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.86738351254 589% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4486985824 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.12 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.88 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.32 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257547464597 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809366343884 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14080601081 0.0737576698707 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157516464613 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117314921941 0.0645574589148 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.