Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the vie

In the recent years, we are witnessing that in almost all jobs interviews, people are asked about some personal information. There is an argument that these questions are useful or not. I believe that asking some personality, not private, questions is beneficial and help us to find the best person for our job.

On the one hand, some people believe that asking questions about personality are useless and may make some problem. Firstly, with querying private information like your habit you force people to reveal his/her privacy. There are should not exist a direct relation between your job and employee privacy. Secondly, in interview person can say lie easily and in most cases, you don’t have any facilities to validate the answers.

On the other hand, some people point out that when we would employ someone we should get familiar more with his/her behavior and we should talk friendly and ask some deep question. They believe that with an inquiry about personal information you may find some habits or interests which is not suitable for your job or the firm environment. For example, in some works, you should always be conscious and if one of your candidate habitats is going to bar you shouldn’t hire him or her. Another reason is that some position need some special character and without asking about personality you cannot assess job applier qualification. For example, you should be an outgoing person if you like being a manager so you must check either you are a proper person or not.

In conclusion, inquiry private information form who one requested your job have owns pros and cons. In my opinion advantages of that outweigh disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help us find' instead.
Suggestion: help us find
...ot private, questions is beneficial and help us to find the best person for our job. On the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a one'.
Suggestion: who is a one
...usion, inquiry private information form who one requested your job have owns pros and c...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in most cases, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01792114695 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64969354606 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562724014337 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3271327206 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249113607465 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905122951596 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621165418415 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149774870765 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659499680901 0.056905535591 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.