Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Public health plays a crucial role in the recent years. While many people believe that increasing the availability of sports facilities is the most efficient way to enhance social health, others argue that this is not a practical approach and other actions should be considered. In this essay, I would describe both of those views.
Some say that public health goes with the presence of the sports facilities and it is the best way. They have reason to say that because they are base on the number of participants in the sports facilities. The more people get involved, the better public health is. The city administration must establish the favourite condition for its residents to have access to the sports facilities so that an individual can build up his or her health. When more people benefit from the healthy environment, social life goes in the right direction. A specific example is the use of bicycle regarding the car using tendency in the big cities.
Some people say that the sports facilities have little effect on the public health. They also have reason to say that. I think society is made of individuals. And an individual has two states of health: physical health and mental health. He or she looks physically fit or even wins a gold medal for a sporting event. But it does not guarantee that his or she does not commit suicide, or is not a mental patient in the future. Moreover, the large number of people under stress is the social danger that can be explosive, and this fact is undeniable.
In conclusion, I do believe that healthy society for citizen’s city will increase if everyone leads an active physically and mentally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Amila Priynatha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Leeinho | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | MHT | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Gholamirayaneh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | junjunh | 78 | view |
- More and more people work from home and study from home with the development of computer technology. Do you think it is positive or negative development? 84
- More and more people work from home and study from home with the development of computer technology. Do you think it is positive or negative development? 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 61
- More and more people work from home and study from home with the development of computer technology Do you think it is positive or negative development 64
- More and more people work from home and study from home with the development of computer technology Do you think it is positive or negative development 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, while, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65487698523 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554385964912 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1079890226 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1764705882 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390164221068 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122579570612 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125651585383 0.0667982634062 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208098079648 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108680708496 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.