The reading passage discusses about a proposal by paleontologists which says edmontosaur had migrated from north slope in winters. But the lecturer disagrees with this idea by rejecting the reasons have been provided for the theory.
First of all, the professor says the sunshine in that area is twenty four hours in a day and it causes a very suitable conditions for growing vegetables and this dinasour can use the dead remains of plants in winter. So the plenty of food in this region because of good environment is a strong proof to not migrating of the species which need food. Also this proper climate prepare these plants with high nutrition which can bring a vast category of edibles for our case.
Secondly, finding skeletons in herd can not provide a reason for migration hypothesis of edmontosaur because there are many animals which live in hers and do not leave their habitat. For example many creators live in herds in order to protect theirselves from competition and predators and it can not increase the probability of this animal migration.
Additionally, however the anathomy of dinasours shows they can go long distances easily without any hardship but the teacher talks about the young edmontosaur which is not able to travel many distances and she thinks the reading forget about the juvenile types of this animal. On the other hand adults can not leave the juvenile alone in herd because they would not survive in herds independently and without support of their parents.
In sum, although the reading passage has proposed seemingly convincing arguments at the first sight; however, the professor in the listening strongly refuses all of the three statements of the article, and has provided complete demonstrations.
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.-Wait until the class or meeting is 80
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 88
- TPO 29 90
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.-Wait until the class or meeting is 80
- tpo 8.Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-four
...essor says the sunshine in that area is twenty four hours in a day and it causes a very sui...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'condition'?
Suggestion: condition
... in a day and it causes a very suitable conditions for growing vegetables and this dinasou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...grating of the species which need food. Also this proper climate prepare these plant...
^^^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...essor in the listening strongly refuses all of the three statements of the article, and ha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, secondly, so, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11846689895 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70714442115 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592334494774 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9596145279 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.9 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261853690149 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104458515332 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676763874647 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139192112313 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785099904119 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.