The government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The importance of science education, which was debatable has now become controvertial. The substantial influence of governments investment towards science education, rather than other subject has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on countries economic development, in recent years. It can be said, government should invest more towards science studies, however, for a country to prosper every eduction field is important. This essay will elaborate why, government should invest in science education and also towards other education streams and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why government should invest in science education, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that, studying science can improve overall development of environment and cognitive ability of a person. example for instance, according to study of Ecology Institute, studying science can make people aware of hygiene, make them resourceful and creative, work effectively. Moreover, it can help to adapt technological inventions and ultimately enhance nations economy. Science education, thus plays an important part in building a countries economy.
Nevertheless, some people adopt opposing view and tend to believe that government funding should go towards other educations fields, is also significant, as there are myriad reason for that, but the most prominent one lies in the fact that, there are other noble pursuits then just science. Example for an illustration, accounting, law, arts, technology, which contribute to a nations success together. Therefore, it can be said government funding should be judicially divided.
For what has been said above, it can be concluded that government funding towards science educations is prominent, but other noble pursuits should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | Palak gupta | 50 | view |
- Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 77
- Company top Level authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss. 80
- Do you think the consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 85
- what is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why? 80
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to solve this problem? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Example
...ment and cognitive ability of a person. example for instance, according to study of Eco...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...s plays an important part in building a countries economy. Nevertheless, some people a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...arts, technology, which contribute to a nations success together. Therefore, it can be ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 5.75862068966 556% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96149615974 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589090909091 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9022400389 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258549746471 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094514346051 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759364899595 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162262424632 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079386610069 0.0609392437508 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.