smart cars are better than the manual cars.
The passage of reading states that the smart cars are more convenient in all aspects, and by providing three reasons of support like time savings, life savings and money savings. However the professors explain that the reasons given in passage are not very effective and refute each point of the author's reasons.
Firstly, the reading claims that the smart cars will prevent the accidents, so thereby saving live. The car will be equipped with sensors which will determine the obstacles and cars, and with automatic programs control braking to avoid collisions. The professor refutes this reason, by saying that it’s not clear according to the benefits by saying that the cars will save lives of the people, as these cars will be more tightly packed and will be more prone to accidents by involving more cars in accidents.
Secondly the article posits that, traffic problem will also be reduced due to automatic cars, due to more speed the cars will follow each other and close driving will save the time and people will reach on their destination on time. However the professor claims that due to high speed cars more peole will like to drive and people will not reach on time as everybody would be using smart cars so it means there is no advantage of smart cars.
Finally the reading holds that smart cars will save the money and repairing will be not very expensive as due to longer duration of items in the car. The professor opposes this point by indicating that due to global usage of driving the repairing will not be vey less expensive; it will be of no advantage of using smart cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-17 | Julie.Zhu | 85 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | villian7 | 75 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | Tanvayee15 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-17 | Prabesh Dhakal | 73 | view |
- learning and understanding the facts have importance. 66
- supervisor and its qualities 60
- friendly parents 3
- venus planet and human life generation at planetThe lecture and the reading are both discussing about the planet venus and how to develop life at venus planet. The author in reading is against the ideas of developinghuman life at venus but the lecturer s 70
- teaching methods 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...avings, life savings and money savings. However the professors explain that the reaso...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd money savings. However the professors explain that the reasons given in passag...
^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ill reach on their destination on time. However the professor claims that due to high s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...s there is no advantage of smart cars. Finally the reading holds that smart cars will ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and repairing will be not very expensive as due to longer duration of items in th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74910394265 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24980568527 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47311827957 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.5432224357 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.222222222 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 21.698381199 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186826494922 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106152385741 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570664165998 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13313911821 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345411856365 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.