When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Building designing has been changing periodically and the main factor is to consider that the wide use of inner space as compared to the outside view. Meretricious building would be magnetize the eyes of everyone, where as, in this essay I would agree with the statement that buildings must be useful for the inhabitans more than gaudy.
Interior designing would be an undeniable part of the building construction. Mainly, space occupied for the furniture's and electronics as well as study area, refreshment for the owners, residents or patrons are also to be indispensable. Especially, building safety must be follow in case of fire, short circuit and so on. For instance, every building must be rechecked and keeps safely to protect from disasters in Japan rather than the beauty. Moreover, success of a building designing would be the satisfaction of the residents to cope up with their basic needs piece fully rather than appearance.
Beautification might attract the tourist to take photograph to establish. A building with excessive surroundings and glorious painting may enhance the people to show their virtue to others only. Inability to occupy all the members and could not arrange the things properly might diminish the market value of any luxury building. For example, a famous building in Singapore is using only for outdoor photo shot because of the interior fail. As a result, lot of money,material and resources has wasted only by the declining usage of inner rooms.
In conclusion, although a building view might be appealing many, not to be outdone, vast area and safe and secured construction would be predominate than so.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | bqcuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 78 | view |
- The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- 1 IN MANY WORKPLACES ONLINE COMMUNICATION IS BECOMING MORE COMMONPLACE THAN FACE TO FACE MEETINGS TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THIS STATEMENT 56
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try an d improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The diagrams below show the present building of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future 74
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and repairing the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ould be magnetize the eyes of everyone, where as, in this essay I would agree with the s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gs and glorious painting may enhance the people to show their virtue to others on...
^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , material
...interior fail. As a result, lot of money,material and resources has wasted only by the de...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18352059925 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89120625862 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610486891386 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.77492505 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.461538462 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163054675072 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594349643768 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489251883486 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100254670502 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504426845357 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.