There is no shortage of debate about whether young people can make certain decisions to make a brighter future for the society. In my opinion i think young people have should be a part in every important decision who have an important impact on the whole society.
First of all, with the world new development and technologies young people are proving more and more their importance in the social life. They are closer to the future then old people and they know what is better for the society. For example talking about the new technologies, young people are more flexible and used to this kind of development they know more how to deal with the mediocre part of this two edge weapons unlike our ancestors who directly go to younger people to solve modern problems.
Secondly, the new generation know more about the social needs. They react fast to the nowadays crises and they find the socials in an easier way, however, with this new challenges the old people are facing difficulties deciding what is the best to skip the problems which force them to ask help from the younger generation. A compelling example of this is the current president of France, he is elected and chosen by his society because he has a young spirit, a flexible personality that make him lean from the experiences of the older people and understand better the younger. In many other country the new generation consist a big part in taking decisions for the future of the society.
To assume, despite many people think that young people do not care about the future and they do not influence on the important decisions, i strongly believe that the level of their influence is already high and the future is between their hands.
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus the projec 3
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 80
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has b 85
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks, so they called t 3
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials. Companies that rece 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...r future for the society. In my opinion i think young people have should be a par...
^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e mediocre part of this two edge weapons unlike our ancestors who directly go to ...
^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r way, however, with this new challenges the old people are facing difficulties d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, i think, kind of, talking about, first of all, in my opinion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76174496644 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45195489132 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.4069625433 48.9658058833 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.9 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8 20.6045352989 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 5.45110844103 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225922320256 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949571514397 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633311811663 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158027871201 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577728059635 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.