The chart below shows information about students studying in six major subjects at the US university in 2010.
The bar chart illustrations the number of learners who studied in six main subjects at the US university in 2010.
It can be seen that except for finance, the other had the different number of males and females student. In addition, it was also the subject that had the most learners.
AS can be seen from the chart, while there was 120 woman studying marketing, the number of men was only 75, which was 45 students lower. Regarding accounting, the figure for female students was higher than that of male students, which was 200 and 170 students, respectively. Moreover, there was the equal number of males and females of finance (230 students).
On the other hand, the number of males studying economics was 150 students, which doubled the number of females (75 students). The figure for of male learners who studied engineering was 52 students whereas 51 females took part in. Finally, 200 was the number of males learning mathematics, this number of females only was 60 students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart illustrations the number o...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...subjects at the US university in 2010. It can be seen that except for finance, ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he subject that had the most learners. AS can be seen from the chart, while the...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and females of finance 230 students. On the other hand, the number of males s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, while, except for, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84523809524 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57264080774 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.5394030834 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.4444444444 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135557256718 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795322775124 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117529360843 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142447132357 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150553611271 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.