The 18th century due to industrialization a lot of people migrate to developing countries. This affected lifestyle and increased major problems in developed countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of migration to developed countries in the 18th century and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that this social incident and its problem for developed countries is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that looking at the effects of this major migration on people's lifestyle can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From the social standpoint, moving to a better place can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that increasing urban areas, as well as technological advancements, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered higher rates of crime and violation in England during the 18th century. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both expansion of cities and social problems apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of culture, migrating from an undeveloped country to a new place might increase the consequences of cultural shock. Moreover, fundamental aspects of proposing a proper solution for such issues relate to this reality that the demerits of entering a new country pertain to dramatic changes in lifestyle. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of overcoming the problems.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of inspecting root causes due to migration far outweigh its drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... the effects of this major migration on peoples lifestyle can be a plus, and I will ana...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45669291339 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10537844501 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645669291339 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.4110118804 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.6 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167405427887 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586793421264 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523616916744 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868559265535 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757159487737 0.0609392437508 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.