The pie charts shows investment made by a school of UK in 1981,1991 and 2001.
The pie charts compares the investment made by a specific United Kingdom's school in the year 1981,1991 and 2001.
Overall, it is apparent that, the highest share of amount spent on teacher's salary, however the least ratio was expended on insurance.
On scrutinizing the data, it becomes lucid that, in 1981, the lion share invested on teacher's salary which was two-fifths, half of total amount spent in 1991and less by five percent was expended in 2001 than 1991, while, the lowest portion invested on insurance which was negligible in 1981 and 1991, whilst, exactly eight percent was spent in after a decade. Paradoxically, significant amount spent on other worker's salary was more than a quarter in 1991, less than a quarter after a decade and 15 percent in 2001.
Probing further, the fraction of investment made on furniture and equipment and resources like books was same with 15 percent in 1981, conversally, it was one- fifths for resources of book etcetera and only five percent for furniture after a decade, However, in 2001, investment made on books resources was remained only nine percent, whereas , on furniture and equipment was more than a one- fifths.
- Food can be produced cheaply by using improved fertilizers and machinery.At the same time ,it has some dangerous effects on human health and may have negative effects on local communities.to what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- The pie charts shows investment made by a school of UK in 1981,1991 and 2001. 73
- When families have a meal together it is considered as a social activity Do you agree that eating together is important to the people of your country 83
- Watching movies are less enjoyable than reading do you agree or disagree with the statement 66
- When families have a meal together,it is considered as a social activity.do you agree that eating together is important to the people of your country. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...t, the highest share of amount spent on teachers salary, however the least ratio was exp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...at, in 1981, the lion share invested on teachers salary which was two-fifths, half of to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of total amount spent in 1991and less by five percent was expended in 2001 than 1...
^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...ally, significant amount spent on other workers salary was more than a quarter in 1991,...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... was remained only nine percent, whereas , on furniture and equipment was more tha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0618556701 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61638995258 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 122.098976245 43.030603864 284% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 196.4 112.824112599 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.8 22.9334400587 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245426996108 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177133286659 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.19214561944 0.0843802449381 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201693141287 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.206879374639 0.0819641961636 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 13.2329268293 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.