Some people think that strict punishment for driving offences
is th e only way to make road safer. Do you agree or disagree ?
It is believed that imposing severe punishment on drivers who violate traffic laws is the only measure to improve the safety
on roads. I strongly disagree with this statement because there are other measures that can be implemented to tackle this problem.
While it is undeniable that punishing drivers who do not obey traffic regulations and laws severely can deter some drivers
from behaving inconsiderately or even recklessly, it cannot contribute to a significant reduction in traffic accidents. This is because most accidents occur because the driver cannot resist some temptations such as drinking alcohol or because the driver is affected by distractions like phone calls or their bad moods. No matter how strict the laws are, they would not be effective to control the accident. Therefore, we should seek other alternatives to prevent accidents.
To reduce the number of drivers offending regulations, it is necessary for the government to raise drivers’ awareness regarding the consequences of their offences and, more importantly, teach them simple strategies to cope with temptations and distractions. For example, if the government could encourage drivers to use soft drinks to replace alcohol
and set their phones in airplane mode while driving, then the underlying/root causes of traffic accidents would be reduced.
However, to improve road safety, only/simply promoting proper driving behaviours is not efficient , as there are some risks that are not caused by drivers. For example, poor road conditions and designs, extreme weather may also result in cars crashes. Therefore, the government should also concentrate on improving infrastructures and effective strategies to deal
with extreme weathers.
As discussed above, to improve road safety, imposing heavy punishments on drivers is not the only approach, thus, it is
better for the government to look for more effective options.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-15 | goodluck0101 | 73 | view |
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small number of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss and give 39
- It has been said that the world is becoming a global village in which there are no boundaries to trade and communication.Do the benefits of globalization outweigh the drawbacks?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own k 84
- More and more people are working at home rather than in the workplaces ,Some people say this will bring benefits to the workers and their families, but others think it will bring stress to the home.Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generations companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire.Do you agree or disagree?Why? 78
- Nowadays it is more convenient and easier for people to travel to other countries Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...oper driving behaviours is not efficient , as there are some risks that are not ca...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59931506849 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03406634685 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3344267857 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.38176352705 228% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139421340391 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524967532589 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469269160725 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583771516048 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429081953405 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.