The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts give data about population age of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and also project their situations in 2050.

In 2000, over half of the residents in Yemen were below 14 years old. Followed by people who aged between 15 and 59 years old made up for 46.3%. Only 3.6% of the total population was over 60 years old. As for Italy, the majority of people were between 15 and 59 years old, with 61.6%. Over 60 years old group occupied 24.1% and only 14.3% of the total population were younger than 14 years old.

By 2050, the percentage of younger people in Yemen would decrease while the number of aged people above 6o years old would increase by 2%. The figure of the elderly over 60 years old is projected to be 46.2%, while the percentage of 0-14 years old group and 15-59 years old group would both experience a decline.

It is clear that both two countries would have more aged people over the fifty years period and compared to Yemen, Italy face a more serious ageing problem

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-09 Molor-Od 67 view
2020-01-08 pateldhruv1708 61 view
2019-12-18 aghasaeed 89 view
2019-12-04 morbymuku 67 view
2019-12-04 morbymuku 67 view
Essays by user goodluck0101 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Italy) must be used with a third-person verb: 'faces'.
Suggestion: faces
...ars period and compared to Yemen, Italy face a more serious ageing problem
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46408839779 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.06409608763 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524861878453 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5835633142 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136946601332 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861256732373 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923394501265 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136357106362 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114653818993 0.0819641961636 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.