Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of parent’s responsibility for children’s act and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of parent-child relationship is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined that the beneficial impact of comprehensive character development can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, parenting skills can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of polite voice, as well as loving behaviour, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered a pattern of behaviour. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both sympatric character and personal sacrifices apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of social science, adoptive parents might increase the consequences of behaviour problems. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the physical punishment could relate to this reality that the demerits of television character pertain to violent actions. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of child labour is correlated negatively with the mental disorder. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of unpleasant feeling.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of parental responsibility far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of vivacious personality prove the significance of obedience, but also pinpoint social implications.
- With enough amount of motivation and practice, people can learn anything that the experts teach in the classroom. Do you agree or not? 85
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree? 36
- Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 11
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, what are the positive and negative impact on life and work. 85
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88803088803 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42704494872 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679536679537 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.192069047 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.083333333 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149576972534 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481506496315 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839771570455 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817096811817 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760550508021 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.32 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.