The advantages and disadvantages of using smartphones
The acceleration of technological developments has made the world a great and convenient place to live in. Because of today's technology has provided various leisure options, visualization of learning content and entertainment contributes to giving people more opportunities to communicate and work together. I believe that for every advantage that technology brings us, it also has positive and negative aspects.
First of all, smartphones are one of the most significant inventions for our in life. Because smartphones can help people keep in touch with families, friends, colleagues anytime and anywhere. Secondly, it also has considered one of the modern educational methods by using them everyone can access dictionary just by tapping the word if you don't know the meaning of the word.
On the other hand, it is true that smartphones can help students in studies but only if they use them wisely. Most of the other students are busy keeping their eyes on their smartphones at all times then they won't get time for studying which would lead poor grades. In conclusion, smartphones are necessary for our modern lives today. However, it is helpful or not, which depends on our ways of using it. It will be better if we use its true purpose and at an appropriate time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-05 | trpg143 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | An14042006 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | masonmount | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | aicungduoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | tatung123 | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 342, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tionary just by tapping the word if you dont know the meaning of the word. On the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 5.60731707317 410% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05238095238 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91528538721 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657142857143 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3795473002 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4545454545 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203682417037 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723158221121 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446009951449 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113398229494 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559394293831 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.