The reading and the lecture are both discussing about whether an individual should be offered to work four days and accept salary of 80 percent of previous salary or not. They are both supporting its perspective by reasons.
First of all, the author points out that offering this option is beneficial because it will be profitable for the company. The reason why it will be profitable is that the rested employees will make less mistakes than before and company can employ more employees to check mistakes. However, the lecturer cast doubt on it by saying that it will have bad impacts on company because employing new individuals will require more money from the company. For example, new employees will need office space and computers. Moreover, they will need health insurance.
Secondly, In the reading, it states that unemployment rate will decrease. The reason is that when four-work day employers rest, the left work will be shifted to new workers. On the other hand, the lecturer contrast it by saying that four-day worker will start working for over time because the owner will start expecting them to do the job of 5 days in 4 days. Hence, there will be no decrease in unemployment rate and the jobs will be even unpleasant.
Lastly, the author says that working for less days will be beneficial for employers. Due to less work hour, the worker will have time to spent it for his or her family and spent it for his or her own interest. In contrast, the lecturer refutes it because she thinks that working for less hour is risky. Resting a lot might affect employees ability to work hard. Moreover, that worker, perhaps, won’t be promoted in any situations and might even lose his job because the employer would want someone who works permanently and a lot.
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 80
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 73
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... is that the rested employees will make less mistakes than before and company can em...
^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun days is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...astly, the author says that working for less days will be beneficial for employers. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 5.04856512141 436% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82679738562 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48020270187 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5496626599 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3125 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374699900869 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121585559638 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061667150132 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215618029817 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393286244972 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.