The table below shows the percentage of the people who travelled by bus in the UK from 2009 to 2013.
The given table represents the preference of the bus by British passenger for various destinations between 2009 and 2013.
Overall, people who travelled by bus for the shopping in the UK contributed to the largest share, while the least segment of inhabitants preferred the bus for commuting over the course of time.
In the UK, the two-thirds of the occupants went to the shopping by bus at the beginning of the given period. Their percentage significantly dropped to just over 50% in 2013. In 2009, only 5% of the commuters used the bus for their professional activities and hardly anyone preferred bus for work at the end of given period.
The use of a bus for the purpose of visiting friends was just above fifth part of the segment between 2009 and 2013 and slightly increased to 23% in last year. The similar trend was observed among the bus traveller for study and day tour. However, people who travelled by bus for study purpose were 3% lower than the tourists in the UK in the years 2009, 2010 and 2013.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-22 | Dileep Kumar 62 | 71 | view |
- Parents of obese children should not be punished for making their children fat.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- IELTS practice for task 1 about maps of Meadowside village and Foton 67
- IELTS practice for task 1 about maps of Meadowside village and Foton 73
- Due to effects of globalisation, the cultures of some countries are influenced by others. Some people think this is a natural process. Others think this is a threat to cultural identity. What is your opinion about this? 84
- There has been an increase in the number of homeless people all around the world What are the causes of it 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he UK in the years 2009, 2010 and 2013.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56988734921 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.710672369 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331617685645 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156181059049 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776992236184 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208043762405 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355811619116 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.