Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measure do you think might be effective?
To a little extent this might be true that increasing price of petrol is a good way to get rid of problems like growing traffic and pollution. Whenever it happens, people start getting rid of using personal vehicles if it is not necessary. But the truth is that, they keep on using it even if the work is of little importance, since today, "Time is more valuable than Money". In today's busy life everyone has very little time and so much to do. So everybody wants to save every moment and utilize it up to the maximum that they can. That's why everyone prefer to take their personal vehicles wherever they go, irrespective of the destination being faraway or nearby.
But to get rid of the problems of growing traffic and pollution we must take different preventive and cautionary actions. We can encourage them for using bicycle or to take public transport for going to their work places or ask them to take walk if they are going to the shopping arena situated nearby. Automobile companies and government must put an extra effort to make more fuel efficient cars and encourage the electric powered cars. All these things may not be so effective but can reduce the problem to some extent.
One more way to arrest the issue of growing pollution in the environment is to increase the fuel (petrol and diesel) prices. It can minimize the pollution problem but may affect the vital sectors gravely. So the government has to take measured and effective steps to curb the menace of pollution occurring through vehicle wastes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-08-08 | akshaya deep singhal | 63 | view |
- Parents are the best teacher. Agree or disagree 40
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals. "In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps, a concentrated solution of Nadasept killed 40 percent more bacteria than the liquid hand soaps currently used in o 20
- A colleague of the great scientist James Watson remarked that Watson was always “lounging around, arguing about problems instead of doing experiments.” He concluded that “There is more than one way of doing good science.” It was Watson’s form of idleness, 83
- “Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persis 48
- Nowadays the way many people intrect with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the type of relationship people make?has it become a positive or negative development? 45
Comments
hallo there, I have done some
hallo there, I have done some edits in the essay so please check it again
Sentence: That's why everyone
Sentence: That's why everyone prefer to take their personal vehicles wherever they go, irrespective of the destination being faraway or nearby.
Description: The fragment everyone prefer to is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace prefer with verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
flaws:
No. of Words: 266 350
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
More content wanted.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 266 350
No. of Characters: 1232 1500
No. of Different Words: 152 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.039 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.632 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.439 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 87 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.462 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.611 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.334 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.497 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.083 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
flaws:
No. of Words: 226 350
More content wanted.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 2.0 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 15
No. of Words: 226 350
No. of Characters: 1010 1500
No. of Different Words: 131 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.877 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.469 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.306 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 68 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 46 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.365 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.385 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.578 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.119 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5