Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: it is more important to have rules about the types of clothes that people wear at work than at school

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: it is more important to have rules about the types of clothes that people wear at work than at school

In today’s convoluted and competitive world, it becomes a highly charged and widespread hot topic whether how people wear at work is more important at school or not. Therefore, some people are the leading proponents of the claim that having rules about types of clothes are more important for a student. However, others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that compared to school, having rules at work is more important. If I have to face these two choices, I tend to choose the latter point. In what follows, I will pinpoint the most irrefutable reasons.

To begin with, productivity at working environment is in direct proportion to being strict about wearing clothes. To elaborate it, when the staff of a company has more harmony, they can reach their targets and goals easily. In addition, Imagine that, if they are free to wear any kinds of clothes, their co-worker can be easily distracted by others type of clothes, what is worse, they spend a great deal of their time on how is style, where can I buy these type of clothes and so on. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. My parents are working in different companies. My mother is forced to wear a uniform every day, in contrast, my father can wear everything he wants. He spends most of his time to choose which clothes are better and which is not before sleeping every night, and therefore, his mind is really occupied by it. Consequently had their company enacted a rule that they have to wear a uniform like my mother's company, he would not have thought about the type of clothes that he should wear.

Apart from decreasing productivity, another compelling reason is that so important have people's health been that human beings' mind has been deeply involved from all over the world. On the one hand, some people believe that people should wear everything they want because they deserve more freedom rather than children and school's students. On the other hand, others believe that some working conditions have their own clothes in order to ensure the people's health such as carpenter, police officer, and so forth. For this reason, I take the former viewpoint with a pinch of salt and claim that the latter viewpoint is much closer to the reality, for I do believe that the more boss enacts strict rules for their employees, the more they can guarantee their health at the working area. For this reason, since some difficult tasks and job are involved with the dangerous, it is better for people to wear special types of clothes.

To wrap it up, considering all aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that nowadays, having strict rule for people at work can bring them more advantages compared with students inasmuch as in the first place, they are able to show their productivity without any kinds of disruption taught, and in the second place they can work without any dangerous situation by having rules that enforce them to wear special kinds of clothes. What make me sure and hopeful is that in the not too distant future people will have more rules to wear clothe at work, for whereby, they can make an outstanding contribution to their society improve, and as a proverb says "the biggest room in the world, is the room for improvement" I firmly believe that it is prominent for us to help our society's breakthrough.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-05-30 Mehrdad.imn 73 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 848, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...ore, his mind is really occupied by it. Consequently had their company enacted a rule that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...heir own clothes in order to ensure the peoples health such as carpenter, police office...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, therefore, apart from, in addition, in contrast, such as, to begin with, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2766.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 573.0 407.700716846 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82722513089 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89258810929 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55163621061 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476439790576 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 846.0 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.2908312102 48.9658058833 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 138.3 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.65 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362655564765 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11548395041 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860296451839 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256332689796 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811477401555 0.0645574589148 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.