Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In this contemporary world, there is a growing trend that a foreign language should be taught at an early age rather than at when they’re teenagers. Although this trend appears to bring in some thought-provoking setbacks, in fact, it is a blessing in disguise. My arguments are as follows.
Granted, supporters of the upside have mentioned some merits worth considering. To be more detailed, adolescents are claimed not to study the second language because of their brains’ developments. They have just climbed up the ladder from kindergarten, where they can play whenever they want. Instead of becoming bilingual, they can choose to focus on natural science and their mother tongue. However, those minor distinctions are not tenable enough to counter the negative effects.
Initially, a look at the features of this issue reveals some certain benefits. Recent researchers have shown that, children between four to nine show opportunity of learning a new language. Among two hundred junior students had been surveyed showed that the gap mentioned above play a crucial role in children’s behaviors and characteristics. Forming multilingual thinking for toddlers may affect satisfactorily in the future, as they can have the advantage on language in this competitive society. Thus, getting better opportunities for scholarships and jobs. Namely, a friend of mine has been learning English since he was four and now, he achieves the admirable SAT score of 1530 and TOEFL score of 118 out of 120.
In conclusion, the issue discussed above is a double-edged sword in which, both the merits and defects should be drawn to attention if one were to pick a side to support. From my standpoint, after careful reflection, I still support the idea of teaching foreign language for kids.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-22 | amanda.mosby | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | satveer278 | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Arfa_Atta | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Manhar | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | berryabhisheksn | 78 | view |
- Planting trees is very important for the environment. Some people say trees should be planted in the vacant areas of cities and towns. While others believe housing facilities should be built instead. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 11
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both views and give your own 84
- Many people believe that the increased presence of violence in films and television these days is responsible for the rising incidents of violent crimes among youths in society They argue that governments have a duty to control the media so as to reduce t 89
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, second, so, still, thus, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28671328671 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08921772855 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664335664336 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5773877258 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178072830328 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505775313774 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051163890561 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989288233368 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608710913702 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.