Employee who are overqualified for which employer might not be happy and how he can be given good position in organization by not letting him quit.
In combative technological era, qualification is imperative part of skills to permeate into several jobs in this world. Eventually, over-qualification becomes problem to judge the credibility of a person. Some people believe that employee with extra qualification becomes burden on organization and other emphasize them to have multi-skills. This essay will discuss over-qualification does not hinder any performance and will explore solution to become durable part of venture.
To start with, learning knowledge is mainly depend capacity of person who is dealing with combat of challenges. For example, while working in company, people sometime learn multiple skills and are eligible for many roles. In addition, people with over-qualification is best for company and plays a pivotal role in terms of multi-skills resource. People with multi-skills are enthusiastic and become valuable assets to company. Organization's management does not consider them as burden on company.
Furthermore, People with multi-skills in venture do not fit sometimes and cause a factor of uncertainty in their role. For example, lack of proper knowledge in several fields, cause them out of eligibility. To retain in same organization, management have to put strategy to get accurate role of employee and put him into adequate position.
In conclusion, aforementioned, this essay discuss over-qualification's influences and how person can be retain in the organization. I will recommend management's strategy should be defined within norms and regulation.
- What are the main reasons of violent behavior in the professional institutions today? 77
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- With increase population and even growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty How can this be solved 78
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 77
- Nowadays families move to different countries for work. Some people think it has a negative effect on children, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In combative technological era, qualific...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion to become durable part of venture. To start with, learning knowledge is mai...
^^
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...tart with, learning knowledge is mainly depend capacity of person who is dealing with ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot consider them as burden on company. Furthermore, People with multi-skills in...
^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'fit'.
Suggestion: sometimes fit
...ple with multi-skills in venture do not fit sometimes and cause a factor of uncertainty in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee and put him into adequate position. In conclusion, aforementioned, this essa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77092511013 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55149693372 2.71678728327 131% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603524229075 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2409119252 50.4703680194 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.5714285714 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2142857143 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100352730733 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362291706691 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361939107996 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694158496625 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453396965167 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 53.1260098522 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.