These days the issue that the university should spend money to support students’ sport activities just as it invests in libraries, is drawing many different ideas. Some people think that students only need to learn in books. Others believe that it is important for students to have good health from playing some sports and having some social activities. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the second concept, for two reasons.
First of all, good health is a prerequisite for students in studying. Playing sports is a helpful recreation for students after stressful working in class. To be more specific, in the university, students often have to take various courses. They need to work hard; therefore, sometimes they are stressed by plenty of papers and examinations. In this case, spots activities, such as basketball, volleyball and jogging are great opportunities for students to fortify themselves and learn more effectively.
Another reason is that sports activities enable students to develop their relationships with other students and faculty, and also bring other universities together. The more we connect with many people the more we are able to make more friends and prepare better for our future success. For example, when I was in nursing college, I went to another university to take a volleyball course. It was an awesome chance for me to meet a lot of students who studied the same major as mine. As a result, we became good friends. We shared our experience and supported one another in our work later on.
I am impressed with the quote which was written by Thomas Jefferson that says “A strong body makes the mind strong”. I believe that this saying is true; thus, the university should support more sports activities for students because playing sports does not only invigorate the body of students but also helps them to learn as best as they can, and from sports activities, students are able to extend their connections to others.
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 81
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 71
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... as it invests in libraries, is drawing many different ideas. Some people think that students ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07668711656 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74726947268 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549079754601 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2749207829 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3529411765 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111342803401 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364131975983 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428249709227 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788492493575 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432738308315 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.