humans' mind is superior to the machines. do you agree or disagree?
The author of the issue embraces the idea that machines and technological advancement are the creation of human mind. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that hardly can machines and technologies make a progress without progression of humans' knowledge. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, it is established beyond doubt that human beings have always put their efforts and bend over backward to push the technology forward and nowadays, we are the witness that technologies have penetrated every single facet of our lives without which our lives seem to be paralyzed. As a palpable example, the computer is one of the most significant and milestone invention of the human mind. These days not only are our lives dependent on a computer but also it is necessary to do jobs precisely and meticulously. As a matter of fact, vast majorities of machines in big corporations need the computer to work properly and this represents how humans' mind work appropriately. To elucidate more on this issue, humans' knowledge and mind are superior owing to the fact that every technology and machine is the creation of humans' mind and nothing is superior to humans' brain.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is that humans' mind always helps the society to overcome obstacles and barriers and find a solution for complex problems. If we take a minute to ponder over it, science and technology are becoming perplexed and intricate in the different realm. So, people need a machine to solve these difficulties. For instance, without the help of the calculator, which is the result of human knowledge, hardly can students solve sophisticated problems. So, they might run into a huge problem and overwhelm by stress during their exams. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that humans' mind is able to make life easier than it really is. With humans' knowledge, we could be able to make a conspicuous progress day in day out and reach the pinnacle of our lives.
However, what was alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Along with innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, although machines are the creation of humans' mind, in any case, these machines work well than humans. As a tangible example, can we even imagine reach far places without the airplane? Or can we imagine solve important problems in a blink of an eye? So, machines are able to work properly and precisely than humans' mind due to the fact that they are able to take myriads of conditions and situations into consideration. However, It was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-12 | amirbahman | 79 | view |
| 2018-06-12 | amirbahman | 66 | view |
- technology has made children less creative than children in the past Do you agree or disagree 64
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 66
- Do you think we should pay attention to opinion of famous people 93
- TPO 45 80
- "In an effort to improve our employees' productivity, we should implement electronic monitoring of employees' Internet use from their workstations. Employees who use the Internet inappropriately from their workstations need to be identified and punished i 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...rdly can machines and technologies make a progress without progression of humans knowledge...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... However, what was alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, really, so, well, for instance, as a matter of fact, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2480.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9500998004 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86604088975 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493013972056 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 797.4 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9024139943 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.826086957 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7826086957 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171573722948 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490977688822 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634218587286 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858793169259 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659071301929 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.