The pie chart below shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year
The charts give information about the proportion of money spent and received by children`s charity in the USA in a year. Overall, The most significant facts to emerge from the charts are that total revenues ( $53,561,580) of children`s charity has a higher number than total expenditures ($53,224,896). In addition, While the figure for donated food shows its superiority over that for other revenue sources, that for program services dominates the expenditures from children's charity.
Regarding the amount of the income, donated food has a larger percentage, which is accounted for 86.6% of total revenue ̶ the greatest proportion in this section. This is followed by Community contributions, program revenue, and other income, which are listed at 10.4%, 2.2%,and 0.4% (of total revenue) each. The exceptions are investment income and government grant that have a similar amount, which is recorded at 0.2% of total revenue ̶ the smallest proportion of income in children’s charity.
Turning to the proportion of outcome, program services have the highest level of money that children’s charity spent, which is noted at 95.8% of total expenditures. Moreover, there are fundraising and management and general, which become the lowest level of this area. While the former stands at 2.6% of total expenditures, the latter accounts for 1.6% of total expenditures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-13 | sasachic10 | 73 | view |
- The graph below depicts the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart below shows how electricity is used in an average home in the same country. 84
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out What are the causes What are the solutions 44
- The bar graph below depicts information about the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. 78
- Today more people are overweight than ever before. What in your opinion are the primary causes of this? What are the main effects of this epidemic? 61
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from the charts are that total revenues 3,561,580 of children's charity has...
^^
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ition, While the figure for donated food shows its superiority over that for othe...
^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is accounted for 86.6% of total revenue ̶ the greatest proportion in this secti...
^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... accounted for 86.6% of total revenue ̶ the greatest proportion in this section....
^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich is recorded at 0.2% of total revenue ̶ the smallest proportion of income in c...
^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'generals'?
Suggestion: generals
...here are fundraising and management and general, which become the lowest level of this ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09038230615 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52358490566 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9471013388 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.555555556 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211944141332 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106210647529 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144041335918 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148928481671 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999310427025 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.