The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.
The chart below lets us compare the amount spent on six different consumer goods, to be more precise, personal stereos, tennis racquets, perfumes, CD's, toys and photographic films in four European countries.
It is clearly visible from the table that Britain has always significantly differed from other countries for the amount spent on given consumer goods. Meanwhile, in France most consumers prefer to spent their money on photographic films, than other goods indicated on the given information.
The amount spent on toys in Italy and France are equal, but in most cases the indicators of Italy are bigger than France, except on photographic films and CDs. Refer to chart, it is evident that in Germany people do not show great interest to consume such goods as consumers of other European countries.
The major conclusion that can be drawn using this graph is that there are great differencies among the choices of residents in given countries.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2014-01-12 | friday1004 | 70 | view |
2013-11-10 | Tohir Bin Umar Irfa'i | 55 | view |
2013-09-03 | ariel1984 | 67 | view |
2013-08-21 | fialka | 57 | view |
- The pie charts below show the units of electricity production of fuel by source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 75
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and ma 90
- The diagrams below show the present building of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future 64
- Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production Some people think that as land is becoming scarce the world s meat consumption should be reduced What measures could be taken to reduce the world s meat consumption What kinds of problems 83
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 80
flaws:
No. of Words: 155 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 155 200
No. of Characters: 776 1000
No. of Different Words: 92 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.528 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.006 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.549 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 49 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.833 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.625 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.167 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.499 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.82 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4