In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railways lines for very fast trains between cities, Others believe the money should be spent on improving public transport,
Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
The last few years have witnessed a significant breakthrough in the transportation technologies. For example, the bullet-train has turned from blueprints to a real method of traveling. While some commenters believe in its fruitful effects on the economy, the others press for allocating the budget towards the maintenance of the conventional means.
As regards the analytics who support the idea of deploying new railways for the 300 miles/hour-trains, they think that, it is an ideal future investment. This because, these top-speed vehicles act as attracting points for tourists, speed lovers and businessmen. Also, their considerable impact on time saving is crystal clear. Despite this future project may erode most of the monetary allocations for the transportation's upgrading, the supporters believe that, this long term investment will aid the economy in the upcoming decade.
On the other hand, the critics of this new invention persuade for funding the conventional methods because of the crucial effects of these means on the regular citizens. For instance, a study was run by the British institute of business in Manchester city stated that, the vast majority of the commuters in the UK, that represents 70% of transportation users, tend to use public buses, underground and regular trains even for longer distances more than faster methods as planes. Thus, the researchers extrapolated that the financial factor is more vital for the average citizens than the time factor. In contrast to the bullet trains which will increase the cost of traveling in favor of time saving,
In conclusion, from my point of view, although the investment in the conventional methods does not look innovative, it has an immediate undeniable effect on the majority of people, unlike these fancy methods which target minor proportions of customers. Also, these top-speed vehicles still are used on narrow scales, and the researchers need more time to evaluate their widespread usage financially and environmentally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-24 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
- Some people feel that entertainers (e.g. film stars, pop musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of jobs should be highly paid? 89
- the maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Dieting can change a person’s life for the better or ruin one’s health completely. What is your opinion? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
... On the other hand, the critics of this new invention persuade for funding the conventional m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, so, still, thus, while, as regards, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46474358974 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10396602942 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612179487179 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.9859445913 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.083333333 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0833333333 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141029849648 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500706229984 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293346575337 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833216495393 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340923818577 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.