Contained in the bar chart provided is data pertaining to how much consumer spent on selected goods in four different countries. Overall, the average of amount spent of people in four given nations was between 140 and 180 thousand pounds sterling, and British citizens spent the largest amount of money on consumer goods.
Regarding CDs, toys and photographic films, one can see that there was higher amount of money spent for this group of consumer goods. British people spent just over 160 thousand pounds on CDs, while around 170 thousand pounds were spent on toys or photographic films. Meanwhile, people spent the same amount of just under 160 thousand pounds on CDs and toys in France, whereas approximately 165 thousand pounds were spent on photographic. However, Italian spent the exact same amount of just under 160 thousand pounds in toys and photographic films, and about 150 thousand pounds were spent on CDs.
Turing to the remaining given goods, which were personal stereos, tennis racquets and perfumes, the average of amount spent hovered around 145 thousand pounds. It is clear that people spent 160 thousand pounds on perfumes and around 155 thousand pounds on personal stereos and tennis racquets. Otherwise, Italian and French consumers spent about 150 and 145 thousand pounds on these three goods, respectively.
Finally, it is evident that, the amount of money that Germany citizens spent on each goods represented minimal difference, between 145 and 150 thousand pounds.
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999. 67
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
- Bar chart: amount spent on consumer goods 67
- Share of total employment, Camba District, 1996-1999 95
- The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age. They are from the United States in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29583333333 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48509096078 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458333333333 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9814786228 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.222222222 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329602229318 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171402678565 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912260421685 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236976753989 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129000047958 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.