The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007.
A glimpse at the graph provided reveals a handful of figures pertaining to the railway systems constructed in four countries in the year of 2017. It is evident that some striking similarities were present in the relationship between frequency of usage and average length of expedition, as well as that with cargo capacity.
China witnessed the greatest number of passengers in 2017, with approximately 27 millions, excluding the users of metro system. The figure outperforms those in Malaysia, Canada and UAE, in which merely less than 6 millions citizens are using their railways. Noteworthy is the fact that the average distance travelled was likely to increase with total number of users. Numbering 1980km per users, China, moreover, saw the farest average distance of expedition, while some 80km was travelled individually with a considerably low of 0.3 million passengers in Canada. Moderate consumption was remarked in system established in both Malaysia and UAE.
With regard to cargo capacity, the figure was deemed inversely proportional to the passengers carried, while a slight fluctuation in terms of billions of tons, with low of 21.9 and highs of 28.2, was registered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-23 | milothemilker | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | milothemilker | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | milothemilker | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | milothemilker | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Marita | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 73
- The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. 89
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- In some countries, using the internet in school is getting popular. Is it positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 84
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, well, while, as well as, with regard to, as well as that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35828877005 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9599691308 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641711229947 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4847487036 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0218608799183 0.215688989381 10% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0112621134461 0.103423049105 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297967514155 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0201872867397 0.15604864568 13% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285491346948 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.