As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to
think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The biggest development that had happened ever is the invention of technology. Every individual in the world is using it for their works. As it is growing more and more the chances of people relying on it also increases because of their advantages. With the help of the technology any task can be finished with a greater ease. This led the people excessively depend on it.
I totally agree with the statement given because when we don't sharp the brain by giving it some exercises like thinking and working on some problems it will definitely rot. It deteriorates the thinking ability and when every time an individual got a problem they just simply use the technology instead of using brain even for solving small problems. Students these days rely so much without thinking like if they want to solve a math problem or to write any code in the computer they just google it instead of thinking how to solve or to write it. If they have any homework related to their subject they will definitely rely on wikipedea or information provided in google. Everyone can use the technology but not profusely and also not for smallest problems which a human have the ability to solve.
The technology also abates the physical and mental health. A human brain is said to be working properly only when the person is physically and mentally good. The inventions like vehicles, televisions, mobile phones which when we addicted to them may lose physical strength because using vehicles for minimal distances avoids the physical exercise which every individual needed to live healthy. Televisions and mobile phones addiction causes people to spend more time on them without doing their own chores and works which will have a greater impact on brain and it finally stops thinking logically making a person dumb.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | roudabehvm16 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Kyunghwan Kim | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | King kobra | 58 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | King kobra | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | pkaul7 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The biggest development that had happene...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the people excessively depend on it. I totally agree with the st...
^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ith the statement given because when we dont sharp the brain by giving it some exerc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h a human have the ability to solve. The technology also abates the physical ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90163934426 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53323196259 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527868852459 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4607888936 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.785714286 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.21428571429 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224569837876 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752489179584 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650567289865 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148227563658 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391675430408 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.