It is true that, studies have become the most crucial part of a child’s life. It is believed that spending more currency on science teachings will boost the country’s development. However, I disagree with the given statement, as this will have a negative influence on the mental health of children.
Firstly, studying the same subject over and over again will lead to monotony in the life of children. As a result of this, their interest will decline and hence, this will affect their performance in the given subject. Moreover, it will not assist in the mental development of the student. For instance, a study was conducted by Harvard university which revealed the pupils who spent six hours per day studying science alone scored poorly as compared to the one who studied two or more subjects during the same period. Thus, focusing on a single area of study limits the mental abilities of the learner.
On the contrary, the students will be unable to follow their passion in other fields if all the funds will be deviated to science exclusively. Furthermore, the knowledge of one subject can be applied in other areas, as all the fields of study are interlinked to each other. Therefore, giving equal preference to all the academic areas will be more helpful for the proper development of a nation. In addition to it, if the pupils will get a chance to learn the field of their interest then they will perform their duties more enthusiastically.
To conclude, authorities should pay equal attention to all the academic branches. After all every subject has an important contribution in the success of a country and none of the fields can be undermined.
- The governement should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Climate change is a big environmental problem that has become critical in last couple of decades. Some people claim that humans should stop burning fossil fuels and use only alternative energy resource, such as wind and solar power. Others say that oil, g 73
- Some people feel that entertainers ( eg. Film stars , pop musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of job should be highly paid 78
- As computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately, learning a foreign language is a waste of time. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, then, therefore, thus, after all, for instance, in addition, as a result, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92907801418 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78980445605 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9838848751 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152820537318 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057529473108 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472511970498 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964169881623 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264084365011 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.