The bar charts well compare how Internet had been developed in European urban and rural areas, within half of a decade, from 1999 to 2004. It can be clearly seen from the graph that upward is the significant trend for both regions.
In details, starting with approximately 15% in the year of 1999, the percentage of Internet access in urban/suburban went up sharply to 50% in the next 3 consequence years. The growth became slower afterwards, until reaching a peek at 55% in the end of a period - 2004.
On the other hand, the proportion of European rural people using Internet had a slight move in the first three years, which contributed only 1% in 1999 to 10% in 2001, respectively. It then started a dramatical increase in 2002, from around 18%, to 35%, which was almost doubled, in 2004.
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales (in various formats) of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011. 89
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 11
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban/suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 2008 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- All children should study a foreign language, starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement ? 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 654.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67142857143 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71265238718 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.7 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 181.8 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5922120071 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148883125691 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634905741138 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556768220879 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943215397625 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187925509037 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.