The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The realm of the importance of investing in teaching science is one in which there is a fair degree of controversy. It is the view of this writer that it is necessary to equally invest in not only science but also other subjects.

It is abundantly evident that other subjects, such as economics, business management and finance, also play a vital role. One should be amly aware that although scientists can invent new products or technologies, they do not know how to market theirs inventions to the end users. In other words, scientists need businessmen, who have deep understandings and skills on business, to help deliver and sell new inventions to the end-users. In term of financial capital to carry out a research or project, people who acknowledge in baking and accounting can support scientists to deal with financial issues.

Another point that support this writer view is that science is not the only factor that contribute mainly to the development of a country. Let put History, Art, Music and Literature into consideration, as no one can deny that these subjects have a great contribution to an economy's growth and developments. As is widely know, a country will attract more tourists on condition that it has rich and diverse cultural aspects. From macro perspective, subjects in Art and Literature area are the key to the success of tourism, which bring high profit to a country. An germane example is Korea who successfully boost its tourism's growth by spreading its such exotic culture aspects as K-pop, cuisine, traditional clothes and so on.

In conclusion, it can be seen that either science or other subjects are essential parts to the success of a country. Therefore, it should have been demonstrated that all subjects need a proper investment from the government so that the country can be developed in every areas.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...s growth and developments. As is widely know, a country will attract more tourists o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
..., which bring high profit to a country. An germane example is Korea who successful...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9118725106 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574675324675 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.1956230828 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.461538462 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174997903873 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621457500241 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508654394227 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117329673398 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609014123067 0.056905535591 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.