Contained in the table provided is data pertaining to total employment share in Camba District between 1996 and 1999. Overall, there was only one type of employment that witnessed an upward trend, whereas the trend of other types was downward.
In regards to Factory work, one sees an increase pattern. It is clear that the share of Factory work employment experienced the highest growth of 11%, jumping from 30% in 1996 to 49% in 1997. From 1997, the Factory work share continued to improve steadily to 59% by the end of the period.
Turning to the remaining types of employment, which are Growing crops and Clothes making, the trend in evidence was one of decrease. During the given period, the Growing crops share declined considerably from 46% to 38% in 1999 after reaching peak at 48% in 1997. Meanwhile, the share of Clothes making started at 24% in 1996 and then dropped sharply to just 3% as the period ended.
- The pie chart shows the percentage of persons arrested in the five years ending 1994 and the bar chart shows the most recent reasons for arrest 73
- Percentage of Australian Men and Women doing Regular Physical Activity in 2010 73
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999. 67
- The bar chart shows the participation of children in selected leisure activities in Australia. 78
- Bar chart: amount spent on consumer goods 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...e trend of other types was downward. In regards to Factory work, one sees an increase patt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 764.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.775 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44425346476 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60625 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.129857024 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275864952533 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114657428927 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143374172716 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166668972966 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705271237836 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.