Share of total employment, Camba District, 1996-1999
The table below introduces us share of total employment at Camba district 1996-1999. Table gives us a clear detailed information, where the employed people went to work.
Looking at the table of share of total employment 1996-1999, the table itself divided into 4 columns and 3 rows.The columns are the years of share employment 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999. Second half of completed table are rows: growing crops, factory work and clothes making. The first important significant growth of employment has been achieved in factory work by 59% to an end of the period of 1999, albeit it was low prior to the years with lower than we have given the number. Second is growing crops led the employment rate from starting to ending with decreasing number of 38%, whereas it started with much muffins porion of table. Last one is clothes making as having the lowest interest across the workers who want to go to work there. Relatively to low, from beginning the clothes making started having low number of shares of employment.
As we contrast one and another the factory work has greatest proportion with significant uprise during all the continued years, while clothes making has decreased trend, 59% and 3%, respectively. I look at the growing crops, it makes me perplexed to describe the trend due to imbalanced proportion of rises and falls. Furthemore we can tell that, however, it has rising years, anyway it reached to low of 38%, whereas it is as much as half of 59% of factory work.
Overall, the highest of share of total employment is factory work and the lowest one is clothes making, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-18 | Hyacinthos | 95 | view |
- Smokers, percentage of population, 1950-1990 73
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 73
- Share of total employment Camba District 1996 1999 87
- Annual music sales in Britain 78
- World oil production 1960 2000 74
Comments
Give me feedbacks and
Give me feedbacks and references to recorrect? thx
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...tself divided into 4 columns and 3 rows.The columns are the years of share employme...
^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...has been achieved in factory work by 59% to an end of the period of 1999, albeit ...
^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... number of 38%, whereas it started with much muffins porion of table. Last one is cl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 611, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'muffins'' or 'muffin's'?
Suggestion: muffins'; muffin's
...er of 38%, whereas it started with much muffins porion of table. Last one is clothes ma...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the greatest'.
Suggestion: has the greatest
...ntrast one and another the factory work has greatest proportion with significant uprise duri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st one is clothes making, respectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, first, however, if, look, second, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 273.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89743589744 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56315000621 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534798534799 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8836848374 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.416666667 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220855254676 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897281847405 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151053673631 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148746845616 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106216110849 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.