The table shows the proportion s of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009
The provided tabular representation manifests the information about the attendance of schools by different four secondary schools during the time period 2005 to 2009.
Overall, it is evident that trend was shown by community schools which had been upsurged in the given three periods with significantly inclination. Although, Community schools initially had a low percentile but it outraced the other three remaining schools in year 2009.
It can be noticeably seen that, there were a slight difference of 1% of total percentile in the given period while specialist and community schools were experienced a same per centum which was accounted for 12% in the year 2000.
Moving further, the most marked change in the voluntary-controlled schools which showed more than a quarter students attended school in 2000 and then went down in the years 2005 and 2009 which were around 38% and 12% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-15 | reverjae | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Chyka | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
- The diagrams show the stages amd equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes. 78
- The bar chart below show the marriage and divorce statistics for nine countries in 1981 and 1984 78
- Coin and paper money will soon be replaced by credit and debit card Eventually we will have cashless society which will be safer and more convenient to everyone 92
- The table shows the proportion s of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 56
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2000. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icantly inclination. Although, Community schools initially had a low percentile ...
^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nclination. Although, Community schools initially had a low percentile but it ou...
^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...12% in the year 2000. Moving further, the most marked change in the voluntary-...
^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...chools which showed more than a quarter students attended school in 2000 and then went d...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 144.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31944444444 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.46410161514 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0504692515 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652777777778 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.1805511776 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.2 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231388386905 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130789327365 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801851465918 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147926448175 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759983327799 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.