The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009.
The graph provides information on how many school learners attended four types of secondary schools over a nine-year period.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the period witnessed an attendance decline in specialist, grammar and voluntary-controlled schools while community schools saw an increase from 2000 to 2009.
In 2000, the figure for voluntary-controlled schools was the highest around 52%, followed by grammar schools in the second position approximately a quarter. In addition, both specialist and community schools had the same proportion of school learners with only 12%.
Regarding the attendance of students in secondary schools in 2009, all categories saw a downward trend, except community schools. Voluntary-controlled schools witnessed a drastic decrease of a third. Likewise, the percentage of pupils attending not only grammar schools but also specialist schools declined about 12% and 2% consecutively. In contrast, community schools showed a significant upward to over 50% of student attendance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-15 | reverjae | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Chyka | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 70
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 84
- The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 150 200
No. of Characters: 847 1000
No. of Different Words: 93 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.5 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.647 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.537 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 74 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 41 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.54 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.875 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.489 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.719 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.121 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4