It is true that, learning a new tongue has become the latest trend of 21st century. With the development in techinical world, people can easily translate the aboriginal language to their native tongue, and spending time to acquire a new language is not considered useful these days. I disagree with the statemnet as it will make humans overdependant on computers.
Firstly, by learning a new language people develop a skill which helps them to communicate with people of other nations. Since it narrows the communication gap between folks, it will also help to bring the culture and economies of various nations together. Moreover, such a practise enhances learning ability of an individual by triggering several areas of their minds. As an example, a study was conducted by the Harvard university which revealed that people who were continuously putting more efforts to acquire different language skills had increased activity in the dormant areas of their brain. They were able to perform other algorithmic tasks more rapidly. Thus, it can also help in the development of mind.
Furthermore, rather than depending on computers, if humans will learn the language themselves then it will boost their confidence levels. It will also open the doors for more employment opportunities for them. In addition to this, artificial intelligence is not a reliable source as many a times an individual may not have access to computers while they are conversing with a foreigner. Along with it, computers fail to interpret the emotional content in speech which is of utmost importance for a successful interaction.
To conclude, although computers can perform the function of translator more accurately and rapidly, but learning of language by humans is neccessary for communication in real life. So, they should devote some time to new languages and develop novice skills.
- The governement should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 513, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inuously putting more efforts to acquire different language skills had increased ...
^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...igence is not a reliable source as many a times an individual may not have access to co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, while, in addition, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25838926174 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91264536038 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2902157833 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.466666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191603479897 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628401009723 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577112511524 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138191601644 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594163986172 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.