The given circular diagram describes the main reasons behind the land degradation throughout the world and tabular chart is revealing information about three particular regions, suffered from the same during the year 1990.
The most striking feature we can see from the first chart is that there are three main reasons behind the land degradation namely; overgrazing ,deforestation and over cultivation , and there might be another reaons too. As it is crystal clear that over grazing covers the largest Part of land with 35/ followed by deforestation and over-cultivation with 30 and 28 percentum of land respectively.
Secondly, the tabular chart represents the information about three main regions that have been suffered greatly from infertile land during the period of 1990.North american land got degraded just because of over-grazing of animals while the main cause in europe wad over -cultivation.However,oceania also faced the problem of infertility due to habit of over grazing.
Overall, it is evident that over -grazing activity is the major cause of land degradation comparef to the other three of the main causes especially in the europe region
- The diagram shows the procedure for the university entry for high school graduates. Write a report for a university or college lecturer describing the information. 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.You should write at least 150 words. 73
- Writing task 2 (an essay)Some people say that the Internet is the most important invention. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your reasons and examples. 22
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n throughout the world and tabular chart is revealing information about three par...
^^
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the land degradation namely; overgrazing ,deforestation and over cultivation , an...
^^
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation namely; overgrazing ,deforestation and over cultivation , and there might b...
^^
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing ,deforestation and over cultivation , and there might be another reaons too. ...
^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: North
...nfertile land during the period of 1990.North american land got degraded just because...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...n cause in europe wad over -cultivation.However,oceania also faced the problem of infer...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , oceania
... in europe wad over -cultivation.However,oceania also faced the problem of infertility d...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42541436464 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30126058632 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.812533725 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 196.4 112.824112599 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.2 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222995404866 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135088717049 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545191675744 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155095344624 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333863901507 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.2329268293 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 61.2550243902 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.3012195122 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.