The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990
The first circular chart shows the information about the agricutural land become less production due to four reasons, and other tabular chart illustrates the offered degraded land in three different regions during the year of 1990
It can be seen that 35 portion of overgrazing degraded on land, and the land had degraded by 28 percentage of over - cultivation. Next, 30 share of deformation was degaded of soil. Then, 7 portion of other caused of land degradation.
As far as trend was concerned the land degraded in North America due to deforestion(0.2),over - cultivation(3.3), and over - grazing(1.5), then total land degraded become was 5 postion. In addition to this the total land had degraded in Europe was 23 percentage due to three reasons: deforestation(9.8),over - cultivation(7.7),and over- grazing(5.5). Moreover, in Oceania region 13 percentum of total land had been degraded from three causes : deforestation(1.7),over - cultivation(0), and over - grazing(11.3).
Overall , It is evident that the maximum total land was degraded in Europe whereas in North Ametica region as minimum total land degraded due to main reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-13 | Vikuns | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-23 | Prabh randhawa | 78 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a UK school in 1981, 1991, and 2001 61
- The diagrams show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is is used to produce the concrete for building purposes. 61
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue? 11
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990 78
- The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on a 2 groups of workers:those aged from 18- 30 and those aged 45-60 ,and shows factors affecting their work performance. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rst circular chart shows the information about the agricutural land become less p...
^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n to this the total land had degraded in Europe was 23 percentage due to three re...
^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... grazing5.5. Moreover, in Oceania region 13 percentum of total land had been degr...
^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd had been degraded from three causes : deforestation1.7,over - cultivation0, an...
^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion0, and over - grazing11.3. Overall , It is evident that the maximum total la...
^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rth Ametica region as minimum total land degraded due to main reasons.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48554913295 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.62034043562 2.65546596893 136% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589595375723 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 171.176400243 43.030603864 398% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 189.8 112.824112599 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184787687255 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991345948387 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076301352602 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135713427297 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874077081175 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.7 13.2329268293 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 61.2550243902 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.