Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting.Agree or disagree?
Recently, government's spending on the art has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "should the government invest on the art?". Whereas it is a widely held view that the government should decrease the investments in art-related fields such as music or painting, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the socio-economic standpoint, government expenditures are bound up inextricably with the government income, which indicates they lead to both money investments and financial difficulties. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between a waste of money and investing taxpayers money as well as an exponential increase in the social welfare. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented so far supports the contention that likelihood of private sector investments is positively correlated with not only the music industry but also a source of income and artistic investments.
Within the realm of the art, without the slightest doubt, the role of art attribute to creativity, in that it would come down to a source of inspiration, innovation, and imaginative skills. A salient example of such attribution is cultural closeness, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take the modern art for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the traditional art problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of artistic creativity.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes, "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that governmental funding on the art should be cut down generally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- in many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 77
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ing goes, 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, well, whereas, as for, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58633093525 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30738328961 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651079136691 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9670708537 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.181818182 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177536918639 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621340264749 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678268488399 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101288015638 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939285268948 0.0609392437508 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.