The bar chart below shows the results of suvey conducted by a personal department at a major company?
The given horizontal chart reveals the information about the work performance of two ages group(18-30,45-60) by different factors. The data is calibrated in percentum. It is clear and coherent representation.
It is crystal clear from the chart, there are ten factors affecting work performance.However, it is the combination of internal and external factors. Moreover, in internal factors ( team spirit, competent boss, respect from colleagues, job satisfaction) are included.In addition to this, the team spirit of two age groups are equal affects with 60% work performance of workers. Furthermore, the factors affect on work performance of competent boss, respect from colleagues and job satisfaction of 45-60 age group is 50%,45% and 50% respectively.
As far as trend is concerned that, in external factors (chance for personal development, relaxed working environment, job security,promotion prospects,work environment, money) are included. After that, the work environment of two age groups are equal affects with 30% work performance of workers. Nextly, the factors affects on worker performance of job security, promotion prospects and money of 18-30 age group is 40%,80% and 70% respectively.
Overall, it is evident that the age group of 18-30 is mostly increasing as compare to age group of 45-60.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-26 | Manpreetgill | 11 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the chnges in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 67
- The table below gives information about Favorite pastime in different cauntries in percentage? 73
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking?Fast food vs. Sitdown restaurant? 61
- In some countries younger people are losing their interest in teaching profession? Why is this happening? What can be done to improve the situation. 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... ten factors affecting work performance.However, it is the combination of internal and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l factors. Moreover, in internal factors team spirit, competent boss, respect fro...
^^
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...lleagues, job satisfaction are included.In addition to this, the team spirit of tw...
^^
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ce of workers. Furthermore, the factors affect on work performance of competent boss, res...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , promotion
...elaxed working environment, job security,promotion prospects,work environment, money are i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , work
...onment, job security,promotion prospects,work environment, money are included. After ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 3.97073170732 453% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62944162437 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48842887632 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.9744679659 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0217799905283 0.215688989381 10% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0108657110054 0.103423049105 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0167743263203 0.0843802449381 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0155134553547 0.15604864568 10% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0114115135491 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.