The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.
The circular chart reveals the information about the four main causes of land degradation, and the tabular chart depicts the information about the affected degrade land in three different regions during the year of 1990. The data is calibrated in percentum. Which is clearly and coherently represented.
As, it is crystal clear from the graph. There are several causes of land degradation. However, the main cause is overgrazing (35%). Moreover, the causes of less productive land is over-cultivation (28%), deforestation(30%), and other (7%) respectively.
As far as trend was concerned that there was three different nation (North America, Europe, Oceania). The highest deforestation had increased in Europe nation. After that, the over-cultivation, overgrazing, total land degraded in North America was 3.3, 1.5 and 5% respectively. In addition to this, the overgrazing had been increased in Oceania country.
Overall, it is evident that overgrazing activity is the major cause of land degradation. As compare to the other three of main causes, deforestation is the major cause especialy in Europe region.
- The daigrams show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the cancrete for building purposes? 78
- In some countries younger people are losing their interest in teaching profession? Why is this happening? What can be done to improve the situation. 73
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.Water use, selected countries - 2000? 73
- Percentage of Food budget spent on restaurant meals, home cooking? Fast food vs. Sit down restaurant ? 56
- The three pie charts below show the chnges in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...affected degrade land in three different regions during the year of 1990. The dat...
^^
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... is clearly and coherently represented. As, it is crystal clear from the graph. Th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'America' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'Americas'.
Suggestion: Americas
... there was three different nation North America, Europe, Oceania. The highest deforesta...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52071005917 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29802973077 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568047337278 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1614897151 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.7692307692 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 22.9334400587 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.61538461538 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212832463825 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065218381468 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726758980797 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134741185166 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683912042697 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.85 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.