Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of complimentry trasnportation for general public and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of no trasnportation fare is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that exposing fees on urban transportation can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, viable and paid commuting services can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that more appreciation, as well as motivations to trasnportation servants, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was uinversity student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered hotels free suttle bus drivers are less careless than paid drivers. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both respect the service providers and acknowledging passengers as salary contributers apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of convinience and citizen rights, no trasnportation costs might increase the benefits of modern life. However, fundamental aspects of free services in a society relate to this reality that the demerits of misconcepting citizens pertain to ask for more privliges. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university in Japan has asserted that the downside of free work services is correlated negatively with late presence of staff. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of free transportation is not helpful in all aspects.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of paid commuting far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of appreciation prove the significance of encouragment in better use and service, but also pinpoint no misuse of service implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | msgnaneswaran | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | msgnaneswaran | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | msgnaneswaran | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | msgnaneswaran | 77 | view |
- What are the different methods students using to achieve information? Online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates? 85
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 85
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of product producers to avoid extra packaging of products? 77
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of product producers to avoid extra packaging of products? 77
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...enon of complimentry trasnportation for general public and its corresponding impact has sparke...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63728813559 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38841326306 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650847457627 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4228836706 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.583333333 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118417864802 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394672268536 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025532858704 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636364784149 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132017718516 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.