The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in new port city centre from 2003-2012.
The graph represents the variation noticed in the three main areas of crime in the centre of Nerport city from 2003 to 2012.
To start with, it was 3400 incidencesof bulglary in 2003 and 3750 in 2004, Fortunately, in the next 4 years it fell down dramatically and reached the minimum figure of 1100 incidences. However, it then grew by 300 accidents and remained steady by 2012.
Car theft was a steady level of crime from 2003 to 2004 and got reduced in next 5 years from 2700 up to 2250. The number then increased to 2700 in 2012. As compared, Robbery reached its peak in 2005, which was 900 cases and decreased back to 500 in 2008. In the following two years, the number of incidences rose to 700 and continued to stay at this level in 2012.
Overall, the rate of burglary fell significantly, the level of robbery remained fairly constant, whereas car theft raised and had the biggest number of incidences in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-02 | Anureet kaur | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-29 | kaur meet | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in new port city centre from 2003-2012. 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affeccted three regions of the world during the 1990 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981,1991and 2001. 78
- The flowchart illustrates the production if colored plastic clips in a small factory. 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm and stages in the production of silk cloth 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... years from 2700 up to 2250. The number then increased to 2700 in 2012. As compared,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, whereas, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 755.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54819277108 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52633825161 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5222907654 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.375 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18670353187 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848240062491 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107452211273 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13398673332 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129821752185 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.