Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To What extent do you agree?
With advancements in technologies, especially in e-libraries, maintenance of conventional library is simply wastage of resources. In my opinion, gadgets as reading device is a most cost efficient alternative but it does not provide medium for interaction among readers that people at library can have.
To Begin with, technology has easily replaced the former concept of libraries the best medium for readers, irrespective of their geographical location. For instance, gizmos, such as Amazon kindle, provide similar experience as while reading the actual book without visiting an actual library. Besides, since there is no physical infrastructure involve, the cost of maintenance is quite negligible. For example, a small city library spends around 50 thousand on the maintenance which is just a tip of the iceberg if the cost of renovation and staff salaries are added, the same amount can be utilized to purchase new books or for building some other facilities for citizens. Moreover, the number of people visiting the conventional libraries are falling exponentially which means wastage of money for only a portion of readers. Keeping recent trends in mind, the reduction in budget for libraries is an acceptable approach.
However, the old-fashioned libraries are not completely useless as it still offers certain unique aspects to its users. For example, it is certainly a great place to socialize with people of similar interest who shares the same ideology. Additionally, as a reader, surrounding environment plays a huge role in enhancement of concentration while reading a favorite book, something which e-libraries can never provide. Keeping this smaller community in mind who still advocates on physical libraries, completely closing down is ignorance to their demands.
In conclusion, although computer libraries offer great value for money, it lacks other indirect benefits, such as socialization. Thus, it is understandable to reduce the budget for former libraries instead of completely eradicating and shutting down the heritage libraries.
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully.Others disagree. Discuss both views, and give you opinion. 73
- You are invited to the former classmates’ party organized by one of the classmates. Write a letter to the host about the following:-Tell that you like to participate in organization of the party-Share about something relevant that is happening in your l 73
- Some people think that people who are over 60 years old should not work and retire earlier To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- The cultures of many countries around the world becomes more similar than they used to be What are the reasons for this trend Is it positive or negative 42
- You cannot go to a company where you got an offer. Write a letter to the HR supervisor to1- Explain the reason why you decline the offer2- Express you gratitude3- Explain you like your current job very much 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.625 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13479071137 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612179487179 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2891528525 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.357142857 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112006367148 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431458545366 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364755963219 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695301757342 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247615860699 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.